Photo credit:

This is not one of those “woke”, “Go feminism!”, “women rule!” articles. So if that is what you came here looking for you might as well leave right now. But if what you seek is the full Biblical context of half truths flying around from skeptics and non believers then this is just the right place for you. Without further ado let us examine some of the greatest misrepresentations of the Bible and Christianity with respect to women.


I challenge the 5.7 + billion people on the planet to show me any scripture saying women must submit to men. It simply does not exist! What the Bible instructs is for No man is given Biblical authority over all the women of the world, neither is a woman obligated to submit to a man that is not her husband. There are also two important caveats to this the skeptics would never tell you.

(i) it instructs wives to submit to their own husbands “AS IS FITTING IN THE LORD” or “AS TO THE LORD” depending on what scripture you are reading. This means in matters of domestic violence or abuse or where a wife’s life is in danger from her husband, there is a lot of practical wisdom to be employed, there is no scriptural mandate to suffer domestic abuse or violence in the name of submission. Again there is a tightrope as in this “go with your heart”, “do what makes you happy” generation, I am aware that there is a tendency to define things that are nowhere close to domestic violence/abuse as such, on the other hand however, human life and interaction is too complex for the term “domestic violence/abuse” which warrants not submitting to be defined. In all cases however, wisdom is profitable to direct.

(ii) Husbands are also instructed to love their wives. In fact this comes before the instruction to women in respect of submission. Husbands are told to love their wives as Christ loved the church and gave Himself for it. An instruction which is no less “strenuous” than the woman’s instruction to submit.


I know, I know, hold your horses! The previous heading issued a challenge asking for scriptures showing that a woman must submit to a man. The more knowledgeable skeptics must have been revving up their engines to quote me 1 Cor 11:3 which says,

The problem is that in the original Greek (which the New Testament was written in), the word “Andros” is translated (among other masculine things),”man or husband”, while the word “Gune” is translated (among other feminine things), “woman or wife”. Further the second “man” in the above verse is “The man” in Greek. If you know anything about Greek, you would understand the definite article is not usually used with laxity as we do in English. So when Jesus says He is THE way, THE truth The life. those are weighty “The”s. Same as this situation also.

So, if you read that verse armed with this knowledge you would see that it begins the head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is THE man. What man? Her husband, which the word “Andros” also translates to.

Furthermore, the episode closes this way,

No one sex can boast over another then since God has designed things in such a way both sexes need each other.


This is actually the easiest one to respond to. It is covered in the same 1 Corinthians 11 cited above. How does Paul end the discourse?

Neither the church at Corinth nor the church at large had any such custom of women covering their hair. Paul was simply giving an opinion on church administration and conduct but was willing to concede it was not a church doctrine or custom if anybody was contentious about the practice he was suggesting.


How come skeptics conveniently forget 1 Corinthians 11 at this point? The verse we just addressed on the hair covering issue. I reproduce for the sake of argument,

” (1 Cor 11:5)

The women Paul refers to were praying and prophesying in church. On a general note, do not forget that the scriptures say of Philip the evangelist,

If Christianity frowns at women talking in church, why does God allow female prophets? In fact the prophesy of Joel reads,


Further, there are two incidents recorded in scripture with regard to Jesus’ interaction with women in His own teaching ministry.

And again,

This clearly shows that women spoke up during Jesus’ teaching sessions and at no point did Jesus shut them up. Who better to put a woman in her “quiet and submissive” state than the Lord Himself? Yet He did not. So clearly something is wrong with the “women being quiet in church” position.

Some scholars have posited that what Paul was against is that the women of the time were fond of talking loudly to their husbands and each other during church services. This is the context of Paul’s admonition on women keeping silent. I however do not think this is needed to debunk this position. We judge Christianity based on Christ and if Christ did not shut women up in His services, it is definitely not the Christian thing to do.

Paul, contrary to what some people think, was not infallible. This might be worth another article on its own. We must thus be very mindful of how we read his epistles. I understand this is a land mine as it begs the question, what do we adopt and what do we leave out, but that is not the point of this article. Bearing in mind that Paul was not infallible though (And I promise to write about that next) is crucial to the next heading.


Classic scripture,

Again, we need to understand the context in all of this. Note here that Paul is writing, not a general epistle to a church or congregation, but a personal, intimate letter to “his own son in the faith” Timothy. He is thus imparting his own bit of pastoral wisdom and experience to his young mentee. He is simply telling Timothy how he, Paul, ran the churches he founded. The correctness or otherwise of that is another matter entirely. However to elevate this to a church doctrine is simply not correct because Paul himself acknowledged female teachers and preachers of the gospel.

And again,

“Greet Andronicus and Junia, my countrymen and my fellow prisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.” (Romans 16:7).

Junia was a female apostle who Paul apparently had a lot of respect for and acknowledged.

So again, we see it is not that there were no such things as female teachers of the gospel, it was that Paul did not out of personal preference allow women teach men.

The lives and legacies of great women on God like Kathryn Kuhlman, Annie Semple Mcpherson (founder of Four-square Gospel Church), Maria Woodworth Ether, to mention a few, remain testaments to the fact that men could and are chosen by God to teach and preach even to men.

In conclusion, Christ is the authority on the Christian world view and the epistles of the disciples must all be read in proper context of the message of Christ as a whole. Doctrine must be rightly divided from instruction, instruction from concession, concession from recommendation and recommendation from administration.



Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
A.B. Melchizedek

Crusader for the truth of the gospel and the logical coherence within the context of the scriptural worldview.