Mohammed Hijab just condemned his prophet LIVE on Piers Morgan
In the recently aired episode of Piers Morgan Uncensored, Mohammed Hijab gave us some more epic moments. From the minute he opened his mouth, it was obvious he had no intention to stick to the debate topic. His only goal was to derail the conversation somehow while thumping his chest in order to impress his followers. However, in so doing, he once again did critics of Islam a favour, by publicly showing just how uncouth and ignorant he is. He did something even more disastrous, other than possibly earned himself a well deserved defamation law suit. He absolutely decimated his own prophet on such a huge platform! “How?” I hear you ask?
His opening words in the debate were as follows,
“Wherever we see suffering, wherever we see death, destruction especially of young people, assault, sexual assault, we see Dershowitz to the rescue, the former defence lawyer of Jeffery Epstein”
“The credibility of this man is on the line, he defends Israel on the one hand and defends Epstein on the other hand”.
Problem though is Mohammed Hijab’s prophet, Muhammad, at the age of fifty two years old, married a six year old girl and had relations with her when she was nine years old,
“Narrated `Aisha:
that the Prophet (ﷺ) married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).”
(Sahih Bukhari 5133)
The youngest victim of Jeffery Epstein was said to be 14 years old. Prophet Muhammad’s victim was 9 years old. This would mean Epstein, in the sense Mohammed Hijab condemned him, was significantly better than Mohammed Hijab’s prophet.
Not only that, Mohammed Hijab is on record defending his prophet’s marriage and relationship with a nine year old girl. In his live stream with Sneako, he declared “P***dop***lia is relative!”. He also argues that the western age of 18 is an arbitrary western social construct and that if a person sticks to only Surah 65:4 of the Quran, they would be drawn to, in his words, “a severe type of P****philia”.
The severe “P*****philia” Hijab refers to is the fact that going strictly by the wording of the Quran, a girl can be married at any age, even as an infant! This is a position another Islamic apologist Daniel Haquiqatou has defended in a debate. He, under some very brilliant cross examination from Mike Jones of Inspiring Philosophy admitted that a child as young as 11 months old could be married off with parental consent! This is what Mohammed Hijab’s religion and his prophet authenticates as perfectly moral behaviour.
Mohammed Hijab’s prophet inspires death and suffering when he urges Muslims to in Surah 9:29–30,
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture — [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.
The Jews say, “Ezra is the son of Allah “; and the Christians say, “The Messiah is the son of Allah.”…”
Muhammad commanded his followers to fight Jews and Christians solely on the basis of what they believed. Mohammed Hijab is also on record stating that he is unapologetic about the expansionist element of Islam and is proud of the fact that Islam is a “warrior religion”. Which is very ironic because this same guy is very much aware HAMAS is hiding under tunnels like rats and he sits down in a restaurant in the UK, devouring expensive cuisine, while applauding and extolling the martyrdom of the people in Palestine. If Hijab really believes the words coming out his mouth, why has he not gone to Gaza to wage Jihad with his wealth and his life as the Quran commands?
Mohammed Hijab is also on record teaching Jihad in his Sapience Institute Youtube page and saying that the reason Christians and Jews ought to be fought is because they are Christians and Jews. This same guy also confirmed that Islamically speaking both these groups are supposed to pay the Jizya “or this or that”
Mind you, the “this or that”, he does not explicitly mention in the video refer to converting to Islam or being killed.
Mohammed waged numerous wars in his lifetime, all of which Mohammed Hijab is proud of. Remember he extols the Islam that is “a warrior religion”.
So Mohammed Hijab defends his prophet’s child marriage and “penetration” of a nine year girl, he defends his prophet calling for the death of Christians and Jews because of what they believe, he defends all the destruction and warfare committed by his prophet.
The point here is this, if the credibility of Dershowitz is to be called into question because of who he defends, Mohammed Hijab is the last person we should be listening to on anything, especially when it involves morality or issues of right and wrong.
Dershowitz is a licensed professional doing his job and in such a capacity, can mount a legal defense on behalf of a client without sanctioning and promoting the heinous acts they may or may not have committed but Mohammed Hijab actively promotes child marriage, the killing of Jews and Christians as well as killing of apostates in an Islamic state. Mohammed Hijab believes these things are okay in light of his religion and the teachings of his prophet, so on what basis can this guy criticize Epstein? or Dershowitz?
Dershowitz was proud to defend Epstein according to Mohammed Hijab but his own very good friend Ali Dawah is literally proud of the fact an apostate will be killed in an Islamic state and Mohammed Hijab shares the same sentiment.
Will Mohammed Hijab now condemn his prophet who is a significantly worse sex offender than Epstein? Will Mohammed Hijab blame his own prophet for all the death, suffering of young people and assaults he committed?
No! Because consistency and integrity are just not a factor in the mind of Mohammed Hijab.
Mohammed Hijab also made a big deal about Dershowitz getting a massage. However his prophet’s child bride scraped semen out of his garments.
“It was narrated that ‘Aishah said:
“I used to scrape the Janabah.” On another occasion she said: “The semen from the garment of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ).”
(Sunan An-Nasai Book 1 Hadith 297)
And again
“Al-Aawad and Hammam reported A’isha as saying:
I used to scrape off the (drop of) semen from the garment of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ).”
(Sahih Muslim Book 2 Hadith 135)
In fact prophet Muhammad would go to prayer while his garments were covered in semen.
“Alqama and Aswad reported:
A person stayed in the house of A’isha and in the morning began to wash his garment. A’isha said: In case you saw it (i. e. drop of semen), it would have served the purpose (of purifying the garment) if you had simply washed that spot; and in case you did not see it, it would have been enough to sprinkle water around it, for when I saw that on the garment of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ). I simply scraped it off and he offered prayer, while putting that on.”
(Sahih Muslim Book 2 Hadith 134)
And again,
“Amr b. Maimun said:
I asked Sulaiman b. Yasar whether the semen that gets on to the garment of a person should be washed or not. He replied: A’isha told me: The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) washed the semen, and then went out for prayer in that very garment and I saw the mark of washing on it.”
(Sahih Muslim Book 2 Hadith 134)
Even if for the sake of argument Dershowitz received a massage on Epstein’s Island, there are no allegations of him being massaged by a minor and walking around covered in semen. Mohammed Hijab’s prophet on the other hand was guilty of both of these things.
I ask again, will Mohammed Hijab condemn his prophet for this? Absolutely not.
Finally, Hijab did make a very stupid point to the effect that if Dershowitz was correct about his interpretation of international law with respect to Gaza being an occupied territory, the United Nations would agree with Him and the UK would agree with him but since both the UN and the UK have come to a different conclusion then Dershowitz must be wrong.
Again, ignoring the absolute travesty of logic in that line of argument and just flowing with it, what the double standard and utter lack of consistency here. The UN charter on human rights is against discrimination on the basis of religion. Mohammed Hijab’s prophet said non-Muslims should be discriminated against and this is something he agrees with. Under UK law, a person is permitted to have one wife at a time, Islam says you can have as many as four wives simultaneously. Mohammed Hijab has in fact on his friend Ali Dawah’s Youtube channel supported the notion that men can have secret second wives which is contrary to UK law. So if the standard for a position to be correct is that the UN and the UK have to agree with it, is Islam then wrong on Jihad and polygamy?
If Hijab really cares about the UN and UK, why in the world does he defend Islamic teachings that directly contravene UN principles and the UK law/British values? The UN has condemned child marriage by the way, but we know where Mohammed Hijab and his prophet stand on that.
To conclude, I love Mohammed Hijab! I think the guy is priceless in making Islam a laughing stock. At the time of writing, 1.1 million people have viewed Mohammed Hijab’s debate and while his fans are cheering him on, anybody with half a brain is disgusted at him and what he represents, which is fantastic news for critics of Islam. Take a bow Mohammed Hijab!
Mohammed Hijab is a priceless national treasure that should be protected and promoted at all costs.
Hopefully the UK government looks into he and his father’s alleged “Cambridge College” scam which he is actively trying to cover up (See the live stream of Jai and DoC titled “Mohammed Hijab’s Family are Scammers?” and “What is Mohammed Hijab hiding?” for more details on this). Has nothing to do with the article but hey, since Mohammed Hijab likes to bring in ad-hominem attacks that have absolutely nothing to do with the debate, I guess I could sneak that one in! And we all know he can take it because he does not have a “glass Jaw”.