The religion of peace strikes again 5: Salwan Momika and Allah’s Quran
Salwan Momika an Iraqi refugee in Sweden was shot dead yesterday in his house during a livestream. What was his offence?
Burning and desecrating a book that called for his violent death, a death he met anyway, thanks to followers of that very book he desecrated thus making his point!
Europe is becoming the middle east. Why would some one flee from Islam in the middle east only to be killed in Europe by what he was fleeing from in the middle east?
Why is it becoming the norm in civilised Europe that criticizing Islam is a death sentence? What exactly are the authorities and even the “peaceful Muslims of the world” so called doing about this situation?
A good number of Muslims celebrated this savage murder on X, if that does not tell you Islam is really a death cult, I do not know what does. A stupid, incoherent, vile book full of fairy tales and all sorts of hate is of more value than the life of a man? Is this really what the religion of God turns a man into? I agree with Winston Churchill when he said,
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia [rabies] in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy”
Islam in a man is really akin to rabies in a dog.
The Islamic rationale for this, in a nutshell is that Islam does not tolerate criticism and mockery of any kind. Muhammad himself set the example in the following hadith,
“Ibn ‘Abbas narrated that :
There was a blind man during the time of the Messenger of Allah [SAW] who had an Umm Walad by whom he had two sons. She used to slander and defame the Messenger of Allah [SAW] a great deal, and he would rebuke her, but she would not pay heed, and he would forbid her to do that, but she ignored him. (The blind man said) One night I mentioned the Prophet [SAW], and she slandered him. I could not bear it so I went and got a dagger which I thrust into her stomach and leaned upon it, and killed her. In the morning she was found slain. Mention of that was made to the Prophet [SAW] and he gathered the people and said: “I adjure by Allah; a man over whom I have the right, that he should obey me, and he did what he did, to stand up.” The blind man started to tremble and said: “O Messenger of Allah [SAW], I am the one who killed her. She was my Umm Walad and she was kind and gentle toward me, and I have two sons like pearls from her, but she used to slander and defame you a great deal. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not pay heed. Finally, I mentioned your name and she slandered you, so I went and got a dagger which I thrust into her stomach, and leaned on it until I killed her. The Messenger of Allah [SAW] said: “I bear witness that her blood is permissible.”
(Sunan-An Nasai Book 37 Hadith 105)
In the above story, notice Muhammad permitted this killing without any evidence at all. What if the man was lying?
This is the Islamic mindset. Any insult (which would include not gushing over Muhammad penetrating a nine year old when he was himself fifty-two) or perceived insult to Islam makes it halal for Muslims to spill the blood of the “offender”.
What is the appropriate Swedish response to this?
Declare the 30th of January “Quran desecration day”. Let the nation of Sweden burn Qurans from the house of parliament to the homeless guy on the street. Let there be smoke from every house from the pages of the Quran. This is the message you have to send to the Islamic terrorist. You cannot reward such savagery by being even more respectful of Islam and its texts.
But of course the Swedes would not dare to do this.
RIP Salwan Momika and I hope your demise would once again be another evidence to all of humanity that Islam is a cancer that should not be cuddled or tolerated in civilised society.
