Sitemap

Why the UK should trust Farage only as far as they can throw him

5 min readSep 6, 2025
Press enter or click to view image in full size
Photo credit: Institute for government

The UK is in a very desperate state. It has no borders at this point and is being flooded with countless undocumented people. No one knows who they are, where they have come from, what they may or may not have done in the countries they came from, what they believe about people and cultures different from them…and worse still, the indigenous people of the UK have to foot the bill of these potentially hostile people (some of whom have been convicted of sexual assault against women and girls)with their hard earned tax dollars, sorry tax pounds and shut the hell up about it!

Make no mistake, radical policies have led the UK to the predicament they find themselves in. Activist civil servants, judges, human rights lawyers have all collaborated in foisting a multicultural cesspit upon the regular hardworking UK citizens. As a result, it will take radical action to reverse these policies and even so, a large portion of the damage that has been done will be permanent. Farage is just not radical enough to take any meaningful action in the face of the existential threat the UK now faces. How do I know?

Farage’s policies on immigration are laughable. Now do not get me wrong, it is better than nothing but it does not even begin to make a dent on the numbers already in the UK. What’s more? He had earlier said mass deportations of those already in the country were a political impossibility. Is it really though? Or does this just smirk of an intention to not even put up a fight? Then he somehow mustered some guts and announced that he will be deporting men who come into the country but not women and children. If this is not a signal for women and children to make that trip into the UK with a guarantee of no consequences, I do not know what is.

Farage has also said his party cannot afford to alienate the whole of Islam because they would lose the election if they did so. Again, according to statistics, Muslims are 6% of the population, if adjust for the illegals in the UK, maybe 10% at best. Why is Farage worried about the 10% and not the other 90% of the votes? Reform is out of kilter with the other populist right wing parties in Europe. How many of them are worried about “not alienating” the whole of Islam? What part of Islam does Nigel Farage wish to incorporate into Europe?

Third, Farage promised to restore free speech to the UK. Again, it is a bit difficult to take him seriously because this is the man who removed “mass deportations” from the speech of Rupert Lowe when he was in Reform, this is the man who does not allow members of his party mention Tommy Robinson, this is the same guy who would not let those within his party voice support for the local protests against illegal migrants being housed in hotels, speaking of which…

Farage is trying to portray his party as being interested in the working class people of the UK. Why then does he not attend, allow his members to attend, or voice support for the demonstrations against the hotels used to house illegal immigrants? Why does he kick out anybody who (Ben Habib, Howard Cox, Rupert Lowe) voices support for Tommy Robinson, who the working class see as a hero and as their voice? Why has he himself lied about Tommy (when he claimed he has been convicted for violence against women)? Why has his chairman called supporters of Tommy Robinson, most of whom are working class, “that lot!”? Is this not turning his nose up at the same population he claims to be a voice for?

Fourth, what exactly does Farage believe and stand for? He has flip flopped on whether trans men will be allowed in women’s prisons, he has flip flopped on Islam, alternatively calling sharia incompatible with the west and bemoaning the proliferation of sharia councils across the country on the one hand to not alienating all of Islam and having a Muslim (the depths of whose convictions on Islam are as yet unknown) as an unelected head of policy. This would suggest that he has no convictions and just wants to win elections.

Now I might be wrong and maybe Farage is playing politics and will be the radical, fearless and courageous anointed one to usher in the Messianic era of the UK when he eventually gets elected in but herein lie the concerns.

There have been uhm interesting stories flying around about Nigel’s donors, particularly the allegiances of those who surrounded his high table during his 25,000 pound a pot fundraising dinner. He has also, allegedly received funding from the World Economic Forum. Is Nigel not therefore painting himself into a corner with the sources of his funding? Do the people paying the piper not dictate the tune? Is Nigel not compromised based on the sources of his funding?

Secondly, the concept of tackling the Islamisation of the UK with a head of policy who is himself a Muslim does not look tenable. Particularly after the tantrum, he threw when somebody raised the question of if the hijab should be banned in the UK. Remember according to sharia and Muhammad’s constitution of Medina, a Muslim must not take sides with a non-Muslim against a fellow Muslim. In the words of the Quran,

Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves.’’

(Surah 48:29)

Now, the Muslim guy might be the most patriotic guy on the planet and want to crack down on his own Islamic brothers, but the optics of it are not great. We do not see the other populist parties combating the Islamisation of Europe having Muslims in key positions of influence within their party. Farage and his party again stick out like a sore thumb.

If Farage is simply playing politics in the bid to get elected, does this not lay a foundation of falsehood? It is literally getting off on the wrong foot. There would be voters who feel aggrieved and deceived because they were voting for one of the very many versions of Nigel.

I say all of this to say, with the level of opposition Nigel will face if he gets elected, he needs a strong and robust backbone to bring about any positive change. If he is willing to flip flop on his talking points, chances are he will flip flop on his actions as well.

The next few years are going to be absolutely crucial for the UK, they need strong, uncompromising and radical leadership and Farage is anything but those three things.

And personally, I would not trust him any further than I can throw him…

A.B. Melchizedek
A.B. Melchizedek

Written by A.B. Melchizedek

Crusader waging offensive war on ideas that exalt themselves against the knowledge of Christ (particularly Islam) & defending the logic of the Christian faith.